Studiebot antwoord

Vraag gesteld door: Gisella van Dun - 1 jaar geleden

Vertaal de volgende tekst in de standaard Nederlandse taal: activities are no longer separate. In many situations, they are the same.
Technology is altering (rewiring) our brains. The tools we use define and shape our
thinking.
The organization and the individual are both learning organisms. Increased attention
to knowledge management highlights the need for a theory that attempts to explain
the link between individual and organizational learning.
Many of the processes previously handled by learning theories (especially in
cognitive information processing) can now be off-loaded to, or supported by,
technology.
Know-how and know-what is being supplemented with know-where (the
understanding of where to find knowledge needed).
Background
Driscoll (2000) defines learning as a persisting change in human performance or
performance potential[which] must come about as a result of the learners experience
and interaction with the world (p.11). This definition encompasses many of the
attributes commonly associated with behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism
namely, learning as a lasting changed state (emotional, mental, physiological (i.e.
skills)) brought about as a result of experiences and interactions with content or other
people.
Driscoll (2000, p14-17) explores some of the complexities of defining learning. Debate
centers on:
Valid sources of knowledge - Do we gain knowledge through experiences? Is it
innate (present at birth)? Do we acquire it through thinking and reasoning?
Content of knowledge Is knowledge actually knowable? Is it directly knowable
through human experience?
The final consideration focuses on three epistemological traditions in relation to
learning: Objectivism, Pragmatism, and Interpretivism
Objectivism (similar to behaviorism) states that reality is external and is
objective, and knowledge is gained through experiences.
Pragmatism (similar to cognitivism) states that reality is interpreted, and
knowledge is negotiated through experience and thinking.
Interpretivism (similar to constructivism) states that reality is internal, and
knowledge is constructed.
All of these learning theories hold the notion that knowledge is an objective (or a state)
that is attainable (if not already innate) through either reasoning or experiences.
Behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism (built on the epistemological traditions)
attempt to address how it is that a person learns.
Behaviorism states that learning is largely unknowable, that is, we cant possibly
understand what goes on inside a person (the black box theory). Gredler (2001)
expresses behaviorism as being comprised of several theories that make three

Antwoord rapporteren