<b>2020-2021</b> <br/><b>INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL </b><br/><b>MANAGEMENT (EBB627A05) </b><br/>FINAL EXAM SUMMARY <br/>In this extensive summary (88 pages – including all graphs, figures, and tables): <br/> I have summarised <b>all six mandatory lectures</b> <br/> I have included the <b>most important things of what each lecturer has been </b><br/><b>talking </b>during the six lectures (e.g., further explanations, examples) <br/> I have <b>added information from the e-book</b> when the explanation in the lecture <br/>was not sufficient for understanding the concept <br/> I have included <b>all tutorial questions and solutions</b> + <b>additional explanations </b><br/><b>and examples</b> based on what the lecturers has been talking during the <br/>tutorials <br/> I have <b>highlighted the most important aspects </b>of each lecture and<b> </b>tutorial <br/>question <br/><b> </b><br/> <b>NOTE:</b> Mandatory chapters from the e-book are <b>NOT </b>separately summarised <br/>due to the open-book nature of the exam <b> </b><br/><b>NOTE:</b> This document is prepared by Vladislav Dimitrov, a third year IB student at RUG. The document is a mere summary of the mandatory materials <br/>for the course IFM (EBB627A05) for the academic year 2020-2021. This document cannot replace the original lectures, tutorials, and mandatory <br/>chapters from the book. Therefore, the author will not be liable for any kind of typos, mistakes or misunderstandings. This document does not provide <br/>100% guarantee for passing the exam or having a high grade. Please consult the original materials. This material is subject to copyright. © <br/><b>International Financial Management </b><br/><b>WEEK 1: </b> <br/><b>How does worldwide accounting diversity challenge multinational corporations? </b><br/>- Q&A sessions and Discussion Board are especially important <b> <br/></b>- The duration of the exam will be 2hours (MCqs and short-answer questions) <b> <br/></b>- The exam (open-book > everything can be used) will be 75% of the final grade; 25% will come <br/>from the group project (due January 8th) <b> <br/> </b><br/>- <b>IMPORTANT!! International Financial Management</b> is the activity of management which is <br/>concerned with the planning, procuring and controlling of the firm's financial resources <br/><i><b>globally</b></i><b>!!! </b>> it is about how companies do with the financing, investing, and the strategic problem <br/>when they are doing business globally <br/>- <b>The aim of the course is to: </b>Address the significant accounting (week 1&2), financing (the most <br/>challenging part as it concerns companies’ day to day operations) (week 5&6) and strategic <br/>problems (week 3&4) that multinational corporations (MNCs) may experience and <i>propose <br/>methods</i> to solve these problems. <b>1. Worldwide Accounting Diversity <br/></b>- Learning Objectives: <br/> Provide evidence of the diversity that exists in accounting internationally. <br/> Describe the major environmental factors that influence national accounting systems and that <br/>lead to accounting diversity <br/> Explain the problems caused by accounting diversity <br/> Solving the accounting diversity by reconciling foreign financial statements with each other <br/>(most important) <b>2. Multination Corporations (MNC) <br/></b>- <b>The definition of MNCs: </b>a multinational corporation is a corporate organization that owns or <br/>controls production of goods or services in one or more countries other than its home country <br/>(Pitelis et al., 2000) e.g. Shell > IMPORTANT <b>a. Why do we focus on MNCs? <br/></b>- MNCs are the major participants of the IFM: <br/> Top 10 MNCs’ revenues account for the sum of more than 180 countries’ GDP, including <br/>developed countries such as Ireland and South Korea (Independent, 2017) <br/> Top 100 MNCs account for over 1/3 R&D investments worldwide (UNCTAD, 2019) <br/>- The purpose of accounting is to understand how to <b>collect</b> and <b>verify</b> information, before we <br/>make any kind of decision <b>b. What are the main Accounting and Control issues/problems that a MNC can face? </b><br/><b>IMPORTANT </b><br/>- <i><b>Subsidiaries spread across the globe</b></i> > the financial information of that subsidiary has to be <br/>prepared in accordance with the accounting standards in that country > different accounting <br/>standards (this is an issue as the information collected from the subsidiary will be different from <br/>the one of the parent company) <br/>NOTE: This document is prepared by Vladislav Dimitrov, a third year IB student at RUG. The document is a mere summary of the mandatory materials <br/>for the course IFM (EBB627A05) for the academic year 2020-2021. This document cannot replace the original lectures, tutorials, and mandatory <br/>chapters from the book. Therefore, the author will not be liable for any kind of typos, mistakes or misunderstandings. This document does not provide <br/>100% guarantee for passing the exam or having a high grade. Please consult the original materials. This material is subject to copyright. © <br/>- <i><b>Exposure to different accounting systems</b></i> > if the subsidiary and the parent operate under <br/>different accounting systems, this will cause a problem and is an issue <i><b> </b></i><br/>- <i><b>Complexity of accounting and control systems </b></i>> the difference will create complexity as the <br/>information e.g. from the subsidiary will have to be “transferred” to the accounting system of the <br/>parent company which takes time and money <i><b> </b></i><br/>- <i><b>MNCs face the problem of accounting diversity </b></i><br/><b>3. Evidence of Accounting Diversity (IMPORTANT) <br/></b>- <i>Presentation differences</i> (Format of statements) > e.g. the way things are organised for example <br/>in the income statement differes > one source of diversity <br/>- <i>Terminology differences</i> (names of accounts) > the name of the accounts could be different across <br/>countries > second source of diversity <br/>- !!! <b>Differences in recognition</b> (how do we determine the <b>nature of the transaction</b> > does the <br/>transaction leads to a revenue, expense or to nothing)<b> and measurement rules </b>(it is about the <br/>money and the numbers > e.g. how much of the revenue will be recognised)<b> </b>(definition of <br/>accounts)!!! > the most important difference <br/>- <b>Recognition</b> = refers to the decision as to whether an item should be reported in the financial <br/>statement or not <br/>- <b>Measurement</b> = refers to the determination of the amount to be reported <br/>- Recognition and measurement procedures affect the amounts reported in the balance sheet and <br/>income statement - <b>Presentation differences - example: </b><br/>1. <br/>In <br/>British <br/>accounting, <b>accounts <br/>are sorted in the <br/>reverse </b><br/><b>order </b><br/><b>of </b><br/><b>liquidity</b> (i.e. <br/>non-<br/>current <br/>assets <br/>to <br/>current assets; non-<br/>current liabilities to <br/>current liabilities; in <br/>the U.S. the order is to <br/>the contrary) > this is <br/>an important example <br/>that can be used to <br/>provide evidence for <br/>the <br/>accounting <br/>diversity <br/>- The most illiquid asset – “goodwill” has been ranked first in the British system, while the most <br/>liquid one – “cash” has been put at the bottom (the most common way) <br/>2. PPE (plant, property, equipment) presentation (gross or net?) > in the US system we can see the <br/>gross and the net values, while in the British we can only see the net values <br/>3. <i>Footnotes</i> are marked on the financial statements or not? > footnotes are very important as using <br/>footnotes you can see how the values were calculated (e.g. in the US form the footnotes are not <br/>presented in the balance sheet) - <b>Terminology differences – example: </b><br/>NOTE: This document is prepared by Vladislav Dimitrov, a third year IB student at RUG. The document is a mere summary of the mandatory materials <br/>for the course IFM (EBB627A05) for the academic year 2020-2021. This document cannot replace the original lectures, tutorials, and mandatory <br/>chapters from the book. Therefore, the author will not be liable for any kind of typos, mistakes or misunderstandings. This document does not provide <br/>100% guarantee for passing the exam or having a high grade. Please consult the original materials. This material is subject to copyright. © <br/>different terminology can be used <br/>Terminology variation can lead to problems to <br/>understand a given statement > go to the footnote <br/>section <br/>- <b>Differences in Recognition and Measurement Rules (example):</b> WARNING + IMPORTANT <br/>- This is the major problem <br/>- <b>LIFO</b> = last item first out <br/>(the inventories that were <br/>most recently purchased <br/>will have to be expensed <br/>first) <b>IMPORTANT <br/></b>- <b>FIFO</b> = first item first <br/>out (when you recognise <br/>expenses <br/>you <br/>should <br/>recognise the inventories <br/>that were purchased first) <br/>- The difference between <br/>the two lies in the way in <br/>which you will recognise the cost of the inventories <br/>- According to the matching rule you should recognise the expenses at the time of making the <br/>revenue (however the timing of purchasing the inventory might not be the same with the time of <br/>selling) > mismatch <br/>- !!! Consequences of differences in recognition and measurement rules for internal management <br/>decisions: <b>distortion in planning, controlling and performance management <br/></b> <br/>- What are the consequences of <b>replacing FIFO with LIFO?</b> (A higher COGS due to the inflation <br/>effect and a lower gross margin; low tax paid and low dividend due) > <b>expenses under LIFO <br/>will be typically higher</b> > net income will be lower > lower taxes (lower income leads to lower <br/>taxes to be paid) > whether you are allowed to use LIFO or not will result in differences in the <br/>financial statements <br/>- Some countries that want to collect higher taxes, might be reluctant to allow LIFO, as under LIFO, <br/>companies usually declare a lower income and pay lower taxes <b>4. Sources of Accounting diversity <br/>a. Institutional Characteristics </b><br/><i><b>1. Legal System </b></i><br/> <b>CODE LAW</b><i> (also called Civil Law)</i> – continential Europe, everything has to be legislated <i> </i><br/>- Accounting in code law countries is <b>legislated</b>; therefore, accounting professions may have less <br/>influence over the accounting rules <br/>- Accounting rules tend to be <b>general </b>(as the legislators tend to have low accounting knowledge) <br/>- Information disclosures tend to be <b>low</b> <br/> <br/> <b>COMMON LAW</b> <i>(also called Anglo-Saxon Law)</i> – relies mainly on previous precedent <br/>NOTE: This document is prepared by Vladislav Dimitrov, a third year IB student at RUG. The document is a mere summary of the mandatory materials <br/>for the course IFM (EBB627A05) for the academic year 2020-2021. This document cannot replace the original lectures, tutorials, and mandatory <br/>chapters from the book. Therefore, the author will not be liable for any kind of typos, mistakes or misunderstandings. This document does not provide <br/>100% guarantee for passing the exam or having a high grade. Please consult the original materials. This material is subject to copyright. © <br/>- Accounting rules in common law countries are generally determined by the non-government <br/>accounting professions; therefore, their accounting rules are <b>more specific </b>(as the accounting <br/>rules and regulations are discussed with accounting professionals) <br/>- Accounting rules in common law countries are characterized with <b>fair presentation,</b> <b>high </b><br/><b>transparency and full disclosure </b><br/><b>Common Law characteristics</b>: (i) there is not always a written constitution or codified law; (ii) <br/>Judicial decisions are binding – decisions of the highest court can generally only be overturned by <br/>that same court or through legislation; (iii) Extensive freedom of contract - few provisions are implied <br/>into the contract by law (although provisions seeking to protect private consumers may be implied); <br/>and (iv) generally, everything is permitted that is not expressly prohibited by law. <br/><b>Code (Civil) Law characteristics:</b> (i) it is a codified system of law (e.g., civil code, codes covering <br/>corporate law, administrative law, tax law and constitutional law) enshrining basic rights and duties; <br/>administrative law is however usually less codified and administrative court judges tend to behave <br/>more like common law judges; (ii) only legislative enactments are considered binding for all. There <br/>is little scope for judge-made law in civil, criminal and commercial courts, although in practice judges <br/>tend to follow previous judicial decisions; constitutional and administrative courts can nullify laws <br/>and regulations and their decisions in such cases are binding for all. (iii) less freedom of contract - <br/>many provisions are implied into a contract by law and parties cannot contract out of certain <br/>provisions. <br/><b>Examples of Common Law Countries: </b>The United States, England, India <br/><b>Examples of Civil Law Countries: </b>Germany, France, Spain, Netherlands <br/><i><b>2. Taxation</b></i> (very important factor, and very important concept) <i><b> </b></i><br/>- In some countries, published financial statements form the basis for taxation, whereas in other <br/>countries, financial statements are adjusted for tax purposes and submitted to the government <br/>separately from the reports sent to stockholders > <b>IMPORTANT <i> </i></b><br/>- In some countries accounting serves for taxation (e.g. Germany, Poland) > in these countries, the <br/>difference between financial accounting and taxation accounting is nothing <br/>- <b>Example:</b> in the USA companies are allowed to use accelerated depreciation for example (they <br/>are goven more flexibility) which leads to higher expenses in the first years, lower income and <br/>lower taxes <br/>- However, in the for example Germany, the financial accounting has to follow the taxation <br/>accounting and companies are not given any flexibiity - If accounting rules or principles align with tax rules (financial accounting follows taxation <br/>accounting), then: !!!! <br/> The net income may lose its ability to reflect the economic reality <br/> Think about a case of car depreciation <br/><i><b>3. Providers of Financing </b></i><br/>NOTE: This document is prepared by Vladislav Dimitrov, a third year IB student at RUG. The document is a mere summary of the mandatory materials <br/>for the course IFM (EBB627A05) for the academic year 2020-2021. This document cannot replace the original lectures, tutorials, and mandatory <br/>chapters from the book. Therefore, the author will not be liable for any kind of typos, mistakes or misunderstandings. This document does not provide <br/>100% guarantee for passing the exam or having a high grade. Please consult the original materials. This material is subject to copyright. © <br/>differences from where the <br/>capital is coming from (debtors or <br/>equity) <i> <br/></i>- <br/>Debtholders and shareholders <br/>have different interests to the company <i> <br/></i>- <br/>The debtors will care only about <br/>the principal and the interest (they are <br/>biggest threat is the bankruptcy) <i> <br/></i>- <br/>The shareholders will care more <br/>about the dividends and the share price <br/>(they do not care about bankruptcy) <i> </i><br/>- !!! In countries where the main source of capital are the debtholders, companies will disclose <br/>more information on the <i><b>balance sheet</b></i> statement where the liabilities are present <i> </i><br/>- !!! In counties where the main source of capital is coming from the shareholders, companies will <br/>not only disclose information about the balance sheet statement but also about the <i><b>income <br/>statement </b></i><br/>- Additionally, due to the fact that very often debt providers stay at the board of directors as well <br/>and they are able to communicate on a private basis with the management of the company, they <br/>might not care much about public disclosure of financial information.<i><b> </b></i><br/>- However, shareholders will care more about the financial disclosure of information <i><b> </b></i><br/><i><b>4. Inflation</b></i> (more on this next week) > could be a very big problem in some countries <i> </i><br/>- Double or Triple inflation renders historical cost accounting useless <br/>- Countries use <b>adjusting</b> accounting records to correct the distorted accounting numbers in <br/>financial statements <br/>- <b>Without any adjustments</b>, during inflation periods, in countries where accounting serves for <br/>taxation, companies will pay taxes on fictitious profits <i><b>5. Political and Economic Ties </b></i><br/>- Accounting is a technology that is borrowed from or imposed on another country > countries that <br/>have similar political and economic ties have the same accounting principles <br/>- Historical events shaping the political arena; e.g. colonialism, trade relations <br/>- <b>Examples:</b> India and United Kingdom (there is a historic link); Dutch Antilles and The <br/>Netherlands; Mexico and United States <br/><b>b. Culture <br/></b>- Culture is also widely considered to influence accounting systems and their implementation <br/>- Culture is the way we think, act and interact (think about Hofstede) <br/>- Based on the cultural variations, Gray (an accounting professor) classified four accounting sub-<br/>cultures dimensions from countries: <b>IMPORTANT </b> <br/> <b>Professionalism versus Statutory Control:</b> a preference of using individual professional <br/>judgement and the maintenance of professional self-regulation as opposed to compliance with <br/>statutory control > whether accounting rules and practice will be determined by accounting <br/>professionals or by legislators <br/> <b>Uniformity versus Flexibility:</b> a preference of uniforming accounting processing for all firms <br/>vs. flexibility (The Germany’s case of depreciation treatment in financial and tax accounting) <br/>> US (flexibility) vs Germany (no flexibility) <br/>NOTE: This document is prepared by Vladislav Dimitrov, a third year IB student at RUG. The document is a mere summary of the mandatory materials <br/>for the course IFM (EBB627A05) for the academic year 2020-2021. This document cannot replace the original lectures, tutorials, and mandatory <br/>chapters from the book. Therefore, the author will not be liable for any kind of typos, mistakes or misunderstandings. This document does not provide <br/>100% guarantee for passing the exam or having a high grade. Please consult the original materials. This material is subject to copyright. © <br/> <b>Conservatism versus Optimism:</b> a preference of cautious measurement to financial <br/>performance vs. more opportunistic methods (conservatism refers to what is your attitude <br/>towards future revenue and expenses that are still uncertain) <br/> <b>Secrecy versus Transparency:</b> a preference of confidentiality and restriction to public <br/>disclosures vs. more transparent, open and publicly accountable approach (preference of <br/>disclosure) > do people prefer public disclosure or more secrecy <br/> <br/>- The accounting diversity can be <br/>presented in terms of differences in <br/>disclosure, <br/>measurement, <br/>enforcement, and authority <br/>- At the top is culture which <br/>influences both accounting sub-<br/>culture <br/>and <br/>institutional <br/>characteristics <br/><b>5. Problems due to accounting diversity <br/></b>- <i><b>Preparation of consolidated statements</b></i> > the first-hand financial information from the <br/>subsidiaries will be based on the local accounting rules and regulations > the parent company will <br/>have to consolidate the financial of the subsidiary <br/>- <i><b>Access to foreign capital markets or financing abroad </b></i>> if the accounting rules in your own <br/>country and in the target, country are very difference, investors will find it very difficult to <br/>understand the accounting statements which might prevent him from investing <i><b> </b></i><br/>- <i><b>Comparability of financial statements</b></i>- in terms of understanding the financial performance and <br/>situation > when the accounting standards are very different, you will not be able to make <br/>comparisons <br/>- <i><b>Lack of high-quality disclosure standards in some parts of the world </b></i>> this is a problem <i><b> </b></i><br/>- <i><b>Example 1: </b></i>Philips<i><b> <br/></b></i>- EU follows the IFRS system, while US uses GAAP <i><b> <br/></b></i>- <i><b>Net income under IFRS ≠ Net income under US GAAP ≠ Net income under Dutch GAAP</b></i> > <br/>reconsiliation is needed <i><b> <br/> </b></i><br/>- <i><b>Example 2: </b></i>the Credit Rating of Public Foreign Bonds <i><b> <br/></b></i>- How do foreign firms issue public bonds in the U.S.? > (1) Deliver financial statements to the <br/>U.S. regulator (SEC). Financial reports must follow either U.S. GAAP or IFRS + (2) Require a <br/><i><b>credit rating </b></i>from credit rating agencies (CRAs) <br/>- <b>IMPORTANT:</b> Credit ratings measure the probability that the borrower cannot payback the <br/>interests and/or the principal of the bond in the future (determined by Moody’s, S&P Global, and <br/>Fitch Ratings) > best rating is: AAA, lowest is D <br/>NOTE: This document is prepared by Vladislav Dimitrov, a third year IB student at RUG. The document is a mere summary of the mandatory materials <br/>for the course IFM (EBB627A05) for the academic year 2020-2021. This document cannot replace the original lectures, tutorials, and mandatory <br/>chapters from the book. Therefore, the author will not be liable for any kind of typos, mistakes or misunderstandings. This document does not provide <br/>100% guarantee for passing the exam or having a high grade. Please consult the original materials. This material is subject to copyright. © <br/>- A higher credit rating means that <br/>the bond is safe <br/>- Higher risk = discount of the <br/>price <br/>- The bond spread is determined <br/>by the credit rating - Rating Criteria of the CRAs: <br/> Analyse Prime Solution’s financial statement; <br/> Compare Prime Solution to other retailing firms: How comparable is the accounting <br/>performance of Prime Solution to that of other retailing peers? <br/> Accounting comparability: A is comparable to B, if A and B produce similar earnings given <br/>similar macroeconomic situation <br/> <b>Challenge: since Prime Solution is a foreign issuer, who are the appropriate benchmark </b><br/><b>for Prime Solution, U.S. retailing firms or Dutch retailing firms?</b> <br/>- Accounting diversity leads to higher cost of capital as credit ratings are based on financial <br/>statements which differ across countries <b>6. Solving the accounting diversity by reconciling foreign financial statements with each other <br/></b>- Recognition and measurement discrepancies across countries / accounting standards > e.g. how <br/>to compare apples with oranges > there is a convergence trend (IFRS) <i><b>a. How to solve this problem? <br/></b></i>- Analysts can overcome the accounting diversity problem by performing the reconciliation <br/>(restatement) of financial statements <br/>- <b>Reconciliation of financial statements</b>: converting financial statement from one GAAP to <br/>another <br/>- Example: <b>Case of Arcot</b> <br/>- Revaluation of property, plants and equipment (a case of reconciliation) > Revaluation of PPE <br/>- We propose a firm who has to prepare its financial statement in accordance with two accounting <br/>principles where: <br/> Under local GAAP, the revaluation of PPE (long-term assets) is allowed <br/> Under U.S. GAAP the value of PPE is recorded at historic cost and revaluations are not <br/>allowed <br/>- In accounting there are generally two ways to recognise the value of PPT: <br/> <b>Historic accounting</b> = once you purchase a long-term asset, then the value of the PPE <br/>should be recognised as the purchased price <br/> <b>Fair value accounting system</b> = the companies can revalue the PPT based on the current <br/>price in the market > if the value of PPT is higher after one year, companies are allowed <br/>to recognise the change in value on the balance sheet as well - How to reconcile the two standards? <b>EXAM QUESTION:</b> <br/>NOTE: This document is prepared by Vladislav Dimitrov, a third year IB student at RUG. The document is a mere summary of the mandatory materials <br/>for the course IFM (EBB627A05) for the academic year 2020-2021. This document cannot replace the original lectures, tutorials, and mandatory <br/>chapters from the book. Therefore, the author will not be liable for any kind of typos, mistakes or misunderstandings. This document does not provide <br/>100% guarantee for passing the exam or having a high grade. Please consult the original materials. This material is subject to copyright. © <br/>- Background info: Arcot purchased an equipment ($100m) at the beginning of 2015. The life of <br/>the equipment is five years, and the residual value is zero. Arcot used <i>straight-line depreciation</i> <br/>and the depreciation started from 2015; During 2015, the fair value of the equipment was <br/>revalued to $120m; <br/>- Question: What were the amount of depreciation expense and the balance sheet value of the <br/>equipment at the end of 2016 and 2017, under the local GAAP and U.S. GAAP, respectively? <br/> <br/><b>IMMPORTANT: <br/><i> <br/></i></b>- <b>Balance sheet</b> is <br/>a snapshot of a <br/>company's <br/>financial condition <br/>at <br/>specific <br/>moment in time, <br/>usually at the close <br/>of an accounting <br/>period. <br/>- If Arcot has to reconcile its financial statements at the end of 2017, then it means Arcot not only <br/>has to reconcile its BS (balance sheet) at the end of 2017, but also its BS at the end of 2016 and <br/>2015 to reflect the impact of the PPE revaluation at different points of time. <br/>- Assuming that Arcot is going to IPO in Nasdaq in 2018 and therefore it must reconcile its financial <br/>statements from 2015 to 2017 under the U.S. GAAP. <br/>- <b>Therefore, Arcot needs to reduce the value of PPE by $8M in the year of 2017 and increase </b><br/><b>the net income by $4M in the year of 2017. </b><br/>- How does this reconciliation affect the ROE<b>: ROE</b> = Net income/ Equity > income will increase <br/>(lower expense leads to higher income); equity will decrease as when assets decrease on the left-<br/>hand side of the equation (<b>Assets = liabilities + stockholders’ equity</b>), the equity must decrease <br/>as well <b>7. Recent Changes in Europe <br/></b>- Convergence of accounting to IFRS – International Financial Reporting Standards <br/>- Interfaces between financial accounting and management accounting are stronger in IFRS, <br/>therefore it become more popular among MNCs. <br/>- However, having a IFRS will not mitigate all diversity <br/><b>8. Benefits of Using IFRSs for MNCs <br/></b>- More relevant financial information for all stakeholders, <br/>- Enhanced comparability, <br/>- Improved transparency, <br/>- Increased ability to access foreign markets <br/>- Better management of global operations, <br/>- Decreased cost of capital. <br/>NOTE: This document is prepared by Vladislav Dimitrov, a third year IB student at RUG. The document is a mere summary of the mandatory materials <br/>for the course IFM (EBB627A05) for the academic year 2020-2021. This document cannot replace the original lectures, tutorials, and mandatory <br/>chapters from the book. Therefore, the author will not be liable for any kind of typos, mistakes or misunderstandings. This document does not provide <br/>100% guarantee for passing the exam or having a high grade. Please consult the original materials. This material is subject to copyright. © <br/><b>Tutorial 1 Exercises </b><br/><b>Exercise 1:</b> (Exercise 1 from the e-book, pp. 35) <br/>Refer to the income statements presented in <b>Exhibits 2.9, 2.10, 2.11, 2.12, and 2.13</b> for Callaway <br/>Golf Company, Südzucker AG, Meliá Hotels International S.A., Thai Airways Limited, and Tesco <br/>PLC. <br/><b>a) </b>Calculate <b>gross profit margin</b> (gross profit/revenues) and <b>operating profit margin</b> (operating <br/>profit/revenues) for each of these companies for the most recent year presented. If a particular <br/>ratio cannot be calculated, explain why not. <br/>NOTE: This document is prepared by Vladislav Dimitrov, a third year IB student at RUG. The document is a mere summary of the mandatory materials <br/>for the course IFM (EBB627A05) for the academic year 2020-2021. This document cannot replace the original lectures, tutorials, and mandatory <br/>chapters from the book. Therefore, the author will not be liable for any kind of typos, mistakes or misunderstandings. This document does not provide <br/>100% guarantee for passing the exam or having a high grade. Please consult the original materials. This material is subject to copyright. © <br/>